Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 16, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Strongly supported the plan, urging a lower speed limit, speed enforcement, and a ban on right-on-red to make pedestrian beacons effective.
Sustainability and Transportation Committee - Sep 16, 2026 · 27:54 →Asked for more handicap parking spaces citywide and urged education of cyclists who run red lights.
Sustainability and Transportation Committee - Sep 16, 2026 · 29:18 →Lives off Forest Avenue, strongly endorsed the plan as a life-saver, but wants 10-foot lanes under NACTO specs and questioned whether the speed limit would drop to 25 mph.
Sustainability and Transportation Committee - Sep 16, 2026 · 1:24:51 →Urged 20 mph design speeds and planting mature trees in center turn lanes to slow traffic and build canopy.
Sustainability and Transportation Committee - Sep 16, 2026 · 1:26:20 →A Forest Avenue business owner said one recorded fatality was a mental-health crisis and cautioned against slowing traffic too much.
Sustainability and Transportation Committee - Sep 16, 2026 · 38:31 →Supported the project but argued concrete infrastructure beats flashing beacons and urged fully separated bike lanes.
Sustainability and Transportation Committee - Sep 16, 2026 · 40:30 →An experienced cyclist and father who avoids Forest Avenue with his son; supports the road diet and wants protected bike lanes and 10-foot lanes.
Sustainability and Transportation Committee - Sep 16, 2026 · 43:01 →East Bayside parent strongly in favor; called the four-lane design a discredited relic and urged the same treatment for Franklin Street.
Sustainability and Transportation Committee - Sep 16, 2026 · 1:20:39 →Portland Trails praised the quick, cheap demonstration approach and pitched rumble strips along bike lane buffers.
Sustainability and Transportation Committee - Sep 16, 2026 · 47:10 →